Title: Supreme Court Denies Tulsa’s Request to Freeze Lower Court’s Opinion on Enforcing Municipal Laws Against Native Americans
In a recent development, the Supreme Court has rejected Tulsa, Oklahoma’s request to halt the enforcement of a lower court opinion concerning municipal laws against Native Americans. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito, however, emphasized that the lawsuit is still ongoing and the appeals court has yet to issue a final decision.
Despite this setback, Tulsa can still pursue its case by presenting new arguments in the lower courts, leaving open the possibility of a favorable outcome. Lawyers for the city have expressed their commitment to seek clarification on legal matters and ensure the enforcement of city ordinances, applying to all individuals.
The origins of this case trace back to 2018 when a Choctaw nation member was cited for a speeding violation. The matter at hand raises crucial questions surrounding whether municipal ordinances can be imposed on Native Americans, following the landmark McGirt v. Oklahoma decision.
In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that states possess the authority to prosecute non-tribal members who commit crimes against Native Americans on Native territory. However, lawyers representing Tulsa argue that the city has jurisdiction over such matters, basing their claim on the Curtis Act of 1898.
The federal appeals court, however, concluded that the jurisdiction granted under the Curtis Act ceased to exist once Tulsa became part of the State of Oklahoma, as opposed to Native territory. This decision has been met with disappointment by Governor Kevin Stitt, who described it as “devastating.” The governor also emphasized the importance of having a consistent legal framework applicable to all individuals.
Despite the Supreme Court’s denial to halt the lower court’s opinion, the ongoing nature of the case provides Tulsa with an opportunity to revisit its arguments and potentially prevail. The city’s lawyers remain determined to address legal uncertainties and ensure that city ordinances are enforced without distinction.
As this complex legal battle continues to unfold, the implications surrounding the applicability of municipal laws on Native Americans stand at the forefront. The outcome of this case may hold far-reaching consequences for not only Tulsa’s jurisdiction but also the larger Native American community at large.
“Travel aficionado. Incurable bacon specialist. Tv evangelist. Wannabe internet enthusiast. Typical creator.”